Last year I wrote about why the misconceptions about my generation, dubbed “young invincibles” by many, have perpetuated a belief that young people do not care about health insurance. Thankfully, the health care reform legislators realized that we too, with our superpowers and all, prefer to be healthy and insured.
The most immediate benefit that dependent young people will see under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the ability to stay on their parents’ insurance until the age of 26; this will take effect in six months. For recent college graduates, and many who have chosen not to pursue a college education, this brings a sigh of relief. The bill also loosens the requirements for who qualifies as a dependent. Even for those who will be approaching 26 soon after the bill passes, the new age limit will afford some time to get coverage through a job with benefits. Marriage status may not necessarily restrict whether or not a child can stay on their parents insurance, as noted by young uninsured expert Sara Collins. Employed children may also qualify for the dependency status as long as they do not have the option of health insurance through their employer. The new bill also applies to all health plans, whether fully insured or self-funded, which was not the case under most state health care extensions to young people.
For those young people that will be 26 before this September, there are other options. The organization that helped esure representation of young people throughout the health care debate, aptly named Young Invincibles, provides a timeline of the other health reform bill measures that will offer help to the young uninsured. It also shows when these provisions will take effect.
One of the main benefits to consider is that by 2014, more young people will qualify for Medicaid. This will help insure about 9 million young people. Young Invincibles co-founder Ari Matusiak finds that young people will be some of the greatest beneficiaries of the health care reform bill because the young population is currently the poorest of the age demographic groups and because the bill aims to make health care more affordable for those least able to afford it.
One of the other benefits young people will be afforded comes in the form of tax credits to purchase insurance from the individual market. These are available to those individuals who earn less than $43,320. While the individual market is not the friendliest place to be, new reform measures will ensure that health care prices will not be based on pre-existing conditions and limits the ratio of premiums based upon age (down to 3:1). The pre-existing condition restriction certainly helps those young people who have chronic conditions (about 15% of us.) Though the age rating restriction benefits older people more than young people, Ari Matusiak rightfully points out that young people are not going to be young forever and can appreciate the idea that we will have security of being able to get insurance without being discriminated against in the future.
Scare tactics are rearing their ugly head again, as many say that the new benefits offered to young people are just increased burdens. Yes, young people will be required to purchase insurance under the new reform bill or they will be subject to a penalty. The fine will be $95 in 2014 and will gradually increase each year (until 2016, when it tops out at $695 or 2.5% of an individual’s annual income). Given this minimal penalty at the outset, many assume that young people will opt out of purchasing insurance and just pay the fine instead. These are the same people that think young people don’t care about feeling secure with health insurance. Well, to put this succinctly, we do care. Some may, out of economic desperation, eschew coverage, but so many of us have relatives and friends who have had catastrophic health issues that have left them in debt (or further in debt), that the choice is not likely to be made lightly. We have had our own health issues. We need prescription medicines and regular checkups. We are not invincible– and we know it.
A majority of us are supportive of the health reform bill. As young people, we must educate ourselves about the health reform bill so that we know where we stand. We are an integral piece of the reform legislation working as planned. And while we won’t be duped to do something that harms us more than helps us, we also won’t be beguiled into believing that the new health care legislation is not for us — it is for us– and we should reap its benefits as part of our political patrimony, knowing that in doing so we also help to provide for our posterity.
Win-Win: Obama’s Student Loan Reform Decreases Student Loan Premiums and Works towards Health Reform Passage
Student loan legislation is being twinned with the health care reform legislation proposed by the House for reconciliation. The language contained in the House “fix it” bill would stop federal subsidies to private lenders like Sallie Mae and would instead originate all federal student loans in the Department of Education. Such reform is estimated to save taxpayers $67 billion over ten years according to the Congressional Budget Office. The savings would be used to fund more need-based Pell grants, which are provided to low-income students to promote access to higher education. In the past year alone, applications for Pell grants have skyrocketed due to the fact that many people are returning to school given the difficult economy.
Because only one reconciliation bill may be passed per year, the student loan reform legislation has been included in the health care reform bill. President Obama wants to include the loan language in the bill because of its estimated savings as well as the benefits it will offer need-based students, and he finds the inclusion a “no brainer.” The Democrats will need at least 51 votes in the Senate to pass the bill, however, and several members from their own party, including Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, have already voiced concerns about the negative impact these changes will have on the loan companies and their employees.
The House Education and Labor Committee has already tried to discredit the claims of those who want to keep the loans with private lending companies. Rachel Racusen, communications director for the Committee was quoted as saying:
Lenders’ claims about job losses have already been debunked as another scare tactic to save their sweetheart deal. While this legislation will trim the profits of banks, it will not lead to enormous jobs losses.
Democrats in favor of the bill add that the private lending companies will still be utilized for other loan services. Some point to the alliances created in the Senate between loan companies and Senators.
Dissenters of the loan reform are missing the bigger picture concern: the benefits reaped by society through the intellectual development and financial security for America’s students. Senator Patty Murray of Washington said:
My own personal perception is, when we have thousands of kids on the street marching because they can’t get into our universities and don’t have the capability of pay for college, this is the best time for us to act.
Filed under: Health Care Plans, Medicaid, Uninsured
Recently released data has indicated that young people don’t care about health care reform. Or at least not in large numbers. The poll, released by Gallup, says that only 34% between the ages of 18 and 34 want their Congress members to vote for reform legislation.
But this conclusion, drawn by so many, may be somewhat at odds with what the underlying situation might realistically be: that young people actually do care about health care reform itself– but are reluctant to bear the costs for not only themselves–but aging boomers as well–especially as young people have borne disproportionately the effects of the economic crisis. For those of us who are in between still being dependents on our parents’ insurance and having health coverage of our own through employment, health care coverage is important –and we’re not so stubborn so as to not admit it– but the cost of insurance at the onset of a working life can be a significant barrier.
Why is there a problem of young uninsured people anyway? 19 years of age seems to be the limit for when young people in our country can still get medical coverage under their parents’ policies. Although many states have altered this equation, many have not. For many private insurance companies as well as Medicaid, young people are cut off from coverage at the age of 19 or when they graduate from high school. Many insurance companies cover those dependents that go on to college, and many college insurance plans provide some level of coverage. But those who choose to join the workforce directly following high school graduation are largely left without. In addition, once a “young and invincible” graduates from college, most are severed from insurance coverage altogether (that is, if they weren’t already).
Again, what might lend itself to misconstrual among all the data on health care legislation support is the difference between young people wanting health reform and being able to afford it– even if we get it. According to the Commonwealth Fund, the majority of the uninsured young adult population (ages 19-29) are from low-income households. Also, more than 2.5 million recent college graduates are unemployed. Important to remember is the fact that recent graduates simultaneously face the difficulty of paying off college loan debt. Thankfully, President Obama has not forgotten that fact.
Some policymakers think that because young people are so “invincible” we make an ideal group to add into the health care insurance pool: we are healthy, cheap to cover, and take up a small percentage of overall costs on health care. For them, it makes perfect sense to add a relatively healthy group to the larger pool of Americans requiring insurance so as to drive premiums down overall and/or increase the profitability of insurers. Ideas like this overlook (or disregard) the resultant fact that young people will then bear the responsibility of subsidizing health care costs of older generations– counterintuitive and somewhat contraindicated when we look at wage status and unemployment numbers for recent high school and college graduates entering the workforce, don’t you think?
Importantly, besides the issue of unemployment, the types of work young people are usually able to secure affect their chances of getting health coverage too. Those who are able to obtain jobs usually start off working part-time or lower-wage jobs, ones which typically do not offer benefits such as medical insurance. Read the story about this young woman who was highlighted in the LA Times; she was unlucky enough to need an operation to remove a cyst while she was still in the introductory period as a new-hire (no insurance until you prove yourself, of course). The only way she was able to cover the out-of-pocket expense of $12,000 was through her parents’ refinancing of their home.
Implicit in all this is age rating. For many reasons beyond its potential negative effects on both young and old, age rating should be divorced from actual health care reform. Age rating would allow insurance companies to actively discriminate against its beneficiaries based on age alone. For young people, such proposed age-rated, young-invincible plans are not even comprehensive; they would only cover medical care in times of emergencies or extreme illness, giving the plans the name of “catastrophic insurance.” That sounds enticing. Hard to believe young people wouldn’t be banging down the doors of their elected officials, adamantly demanding “catastrophic insurance,” right?
Better plans would incorporate the real needs of young people: preventive care, prescription benefits, and affordability. These issues are not just unique to older generations. If we want to keep the so-called invincibles healthy, we have to give them better options than just care in times of dire need. Keeping young people on their parents’ insurance until a certain age limit is a good idea, as long as it plays out in practice too. Anything is better than forcing young people to get coverage they can’t afford. If you want our support for health care reform, try tailoring some of the reform bills to what we actually need.