Navigating the New Field of International Health Law, Featuring Gian Luca Burci, Legal Counsel for WHO

This lecture, “Navigating the New Field of International Health Law,” will explore the intersection of health and international law and the emergence of International Health Law as a practice area. Featuring Gian Luca Burci, Legal Counsel for the World Health Organization, this program will focus on the growing interactions between health policy and various areas of international law, including international business transactions, intellectual property, international security, and human rights law. The program is sponsored by the Seton Hall Law Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law & Policy and the International Law program at Seton Hall Law.

The event will take place at Seton Hall Law, Newark, NJ, on Wednesday, February 22, 6 to 7 p.m.  There is no charge. 1 New Jersey CLE credit will be available. Click here to make your reservation or for more information, please contact Sara Simon, Director, Healthcare Compliance Certification Program, at sara.simon@shu.edu or call 973-642-8190.

The Global Burden of Stillbirth

As a teenager in the late 1980s, I was a huge fan of the model Christy Turlington Burns.  As I’ve blogged about before, in 2011 there’s much more to admire about her than her enduring beauty.  Over the weekend, Turlington Burns and others representing her advocacy organization, Every Mother Counts, ran the ING New York City Marathon to, in her words, “make the vital connection for people that so many pregnant women live far from health services around the world and that distance does make a difference [in the prevention of maternal mortality]. Simply put, we want to run so that others don’t have to…”

Just as distance makes a difference in the prevention of maternal mortality, it also makes a difference in the prevention of stillbirth.[1] In the introduction to a special series of articles that ran in The Lancet in April of this year, Zoe Mullan and Richard Horton note that 98% of the estimated 2.64 million stillbirths each year, “occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and in places such as south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, at least half of them take place during labour or birth.”  In addition to reducing maternal and newborn mortality rates, then, closing the literal and figurative distance between pregnant women and childbirth care would prevent many stillbirths from occurring.

In a pair of important articles - Stillbirths: What Difference Can We Make and At What Cost? and Stillbirths: How Can Health Systems Deliver for Mothers and Babies — The Lancet’s Stillbirths Series Steering Committee delves into the prevention question in detail.  The Steering Committee systematically assessed 35 potential interventions to determine (1) whether they were effective at reducing the stillbirth rate and (2) “whether they are affordable and implementable in low-income and middle-income countries.”   The following ten interventions passed the Committee’s test and were strongly recommended for implementation: “periconceptional folic acid fortification, insecticide-treated bednets or intermittent preventive treatment for malaria prevention, syphilis detection and treatment, detection and management of hypertensive disease of pregnancy, detection and management of diabetes of pregnancy, detection and management of fetal growth restriction, routine induction to prevent post-term pregnancies, skilled care at birth, basic emergency obstetric care, and comprehensive emergency obstetric care.”  Of these, the Committee recommended that skilled care at birth and emergency obstetric care take priority, both because they were the most effective at reducing the number of stillbirths and because they additionally benefit women and newborn babies.

The Stillbirths Series Committee estimated that “[i]n 68 countries accounting for 92% of the worldwide burden of stillbirths in 2008, universal coverage of care (99%) with intervention packages in 2015 could save up to 1.1 million (45%) third-trimester stillbirths, 201,000 (54%) maternal deaths, and 1.4 million (43%) neonatal deaths at an additional cost of US $2.32 per person, which is well below the WHO and World Bank criteria for cost-effectiveness.”  While it seems only fair to consider this “triple return for every dollar invested” in determining funding priorities, the tragedy of stillbirth does not always “count.”

The World Health Organization’s Global Burden of Disease analysis, for example, which aims to “provide[] a comprehensive and comparable assessment of mortality and loss of health due to diseases, injuries and risk factors for all regions of the world[,]” does not factor in stillbirths.  The WHO explains on its website that “[p]erinatal mortality, defined as number of stillbirths and deaths in the first week of life per 1,000 live births, is a useful additional indicator, and work is ongoing to improve estimates of stillbirth rates, a major component of perinatal mortality.”  The United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals similarly fail to include reducing the rate of stillbirths.  This should change.  In the words of Mullan and Horton in The Lancet, “stillbirths matter to people” and “stillbirth prevention should be placed as highly on global and national health agendas as prevention of maternal and neonatal deaths.”

---

[1] I thank Catherine Finizio, the Administrator of Seton Hall Law’s Center for Health & Pharmaceutical Law & Policy, for keeping me focused on this important issue.  (My prior posts are here and here.)  Cathy’s grandson, Colin Joseph Mahoney, was stillborn at 39 weeks gestation on November 10, 2008.

For Vietnam, Sharp Increase in Infant Fatalities by Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease

[Ed. Note: We are pleased to welcome Clarissa Gomez to HRW. She is a first year student at Seton Hall University School of Law and graduated in December, 2010 from The College of New Jersey with a B.A. in English and Women and Gender Studies, and a minor in Law, Philosophy and Politics. While she is fairly new to the world of health law, she is currently a representative for the SHU Health Law Forum. Being well-traveled and witnessing the healthcare disparities throughout the world, she has high interest in international healthcare regarding access to treatment and disease prevention, as well as those issues regarding womens' health.]

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently reported information regarding the current outbreak of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) in Vietnam. While Avian influenza and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) have been the two leading outbreak diseases in Vietnam over the past eight years, HFMD is the topic of the country’s current health concerns.  Traditionally, HFMD has been common in Vietnam and there have been reports of larger-scale outbreaks from time to time, but so far this year the infection and death toll statistics are already significantly higher than usual. More than 42,000 individuals have been sickened this year, a vast increase from the 10,000 to 15,000 cases that have been reported on average per year since 2008. The main targets of HFMD have been children three years old or younger, and so far 98 children have died from the disease– that is already about triple the  average annual number of chidren’s deaths.

Earlier this year I had the privilege of traveling the dusty, motorcycle-infested streets of Vietnam. After witnessing first-hand the severe lack of sanitary rules to govern sidewalk phở eateries and other food vendors, along with the knowledge that HFMD is most often spread from person to person through contact with virus-contaminated surfaces like unwashed hands, the recent report by WHO is not shocking. The virus can survive for a long period of time in the environment or sewage, which adds to the difficulty in preventing and controlling its spread. Children have the highest risk for infection since they lack the protection of antibodies that are developed within a person’s body with age. While no vaccine or specific treatment exists, the disease has generally been described as mild and quickly recoverable. So, then, what is surprising is the drastic increase in deaths from previous years; it is unclear what may account for this, and the Vietnamese Ministry of Health further warns that the number of cases will likely increase even more in the coming months as children most at risk resume preschool and kindergarten.

I had quite the experience traveling on the train called the “Reunification Express”;  it allows one to travel from north to south Vietnam and vice versa. I was told, and to my surprise, that the train had been modernized and had seen many improvements over the past few years. Suffice it to say, it was no Amtrak. The bathroom consisted of a toilet bowl with a hole that led directly to the train tracks and ground. I could only imagine where the goods of those who used it for relief ended up. Issues of personal hygiene and sanitary practices are at the forefront of the outbreak of HFMD, which is why I mention the train facilities above. The WHO report attributed the spread of HMFD to contact with fluid in blisters or infected feces. As disgusting as it sounds, encountering bodily waste on the street is not a terribly rare or shocking event in rural Vietnam. Perhaps it is a lack of — or disregard for– these everyday public health lifestyle practices that can, and most likely does, account for the statistics being reported by WHO.

Fortunately, the Ministry of Health is closely monitoring the situation and precautionary measures have already been implemented throughout the country in order to reduce further spread of the disease. All health care facilities have received guidelines for surveillance, prevention and treatment of the disease; training courses are being conducted for preventive medicine staff as well as pre-school teachers, and a nation-wide public awareness campaign on television and other means of media are relaying preventative measures to the citizens.

Increased standards of both personal hygiene and environmental care are crucial to the prevention of HFMD, as there is no specific medication administered to combat the disease. It is hopeful, then, that the campaign for heightened awareness will not only prevent the further spread of the virus and lessen the number of casualties due to HFMD, but that Vietnam as a country will benefit as well. Despite the numerous public health issues I encountered, it is, among the countries I’ve visited, one of my favorites.  And since my most recent trip, I hold Ho Chi Minh and Hanoi as two must go-to cities that I desire to travel back to in the future…but I just may not plan my trip between the months of March to May and September to December. Why? Southern Ho Chi Minh city has been one of the hardest hit by HFMD and these months are when the rates of infection are highest.

As tourism accounts for a relatively small but steadily increasing and significant portion of Viet Nam’s economy, it is not hard to believe that the institution of increased sanitary and public health measures, which one might presume will lessen the occurrence and spread of infectious diseases, will ultimately help Viet Nam from both a substantive health and an economic perspective.

Photo Credit: 1, by anjči via Flickr; 2 & 3, Clarissa Gomez

New Jersey-based group digs wells to fight disease and malnutrition in Malawi

Today’s post comes from Seton Hall Law LL.M candidate and former long time Newark Star Ledger reporter, Robert Schwaneberg, J.D.

Health Reform Watch is truly pleased to welcome a reporter of such great renown to our blog.

By ROBERT SCHWANEBERG

The road to Euthini in northern Malawi is a narrow dirt path through fields of gourds, maize and peanuts, known locally as groundnuts. The delegation from WorldHope Corps arrives, by four-wheel-drive vehicle, to find the village leaders waiting under a tree. They are sitting in straight-backed wooden chairs with velveteen cushions that seem strangely elegant in this poor African community that lacks electricity, modern sanitation and any source of clean water.

According to the World Health Organization, 38 percent of rural Malawi lacks access to improved water sources.[i] Along with high rates of HIV infection, lack of clean water is a leading reason “Malawi’s health indicators are among the worst in the world.”[ii] Water-borne diseases such as diarrhea and cholera are “common in Malawi”[iii] and are among the top three killers of children under five.[iv] A survey done in 2000 found 18% of children under five had experienced diarrhea in the preceding two weeks.[v]

WorldHope Corps is trying to change that. Working with other non-governmental organizations, churches and private donors, it has arranged the installation of six hand-pumped wells in Malawi in the past two years and has plans for more.

“Wells are the water of life,” said the Rev. Michael Christensen, who teaches at Drew University in Madison, N.J., and founded WorldHope Corps in 2007. “If we can provide clean water to villages without water, we can save hundreds of lives because one out of five children dies under the age of five of water-borne diseases like cholera, dysentery and malaria.”

Drilling wells in northern Malawi is expensive. Holes have to be bored deep — 50 to 100 meters — to get below the groundwater contamination that pollutes shallow wells. Heavy rigs must be brought in from the southern part of the country, where the only drilling companies are located, and transported over primitive “roads” like the dirt path to Euthini. There are additional costs for having a government official inspect the work and certify the well is deep enough to provide safe water.

“All in all, it’s about $10,000, give or take $500,” Christensen said. He hopes to cut the cost by helping one of WorldHope Corp’s partners, CitiHope International, form a well-drilling business in northern Malawi.

“The prospects are very good,” Christensen said. “I think by this time next year we’ll have the beginnings of a well business that will cut the cost of a well in half.”

Last month, Christensen led a team of 10 volunteers on a 12-day mission to inspect existing well sites in Malawi and scout locations for new ones. Michael Bond of Basking Ridge, N.J., did not go with the idea of funding a well. He decided to do so after observing the stark differences between Euthini, where women haul water from a stream about a kilometer away, and Zowe, which got a deep well through WorldHope Corps in 2007.

“The life of a village, the life of a people changes dramatically once they get fresh, clean water,” Bond said. At Zowe, which also has a part-time medical clinic, Bond learned from the health surveillance officer that a remarkable thing happened after it got its well: No child died during 2008.

“The ah-hah moment for me was the difference a 20-minute drive down that trail (from Zowe to Euthini) made,” Bond said. “The difference was night and day. The kids were in dirty clothes; they were dirty because they weren’t bathed. Some showed signs of malnutrition.”

Malnutrition results not just from poor agricultural yields, but also from dirty water. About half the cases of underweight children are due to repeated bouts of diarrhea and intestinal infections from unsafe water and substandard sanitation and hygiene, according to W.H.O.’s 2008 report, “Safer Water, Better Health.”[vi] Globally, W.H.O. estimates that each year 860,000 children under five die from malnutrition induced by unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and insufficient hygiene.[vii]

The visit to Euthini ended with Christensen calling for a village youngster to fetch a shovel to break ground for its new well. But first, as he does with all his projects, Christensen enlisted the villagers in a partnership. He asked what they would contribute; they replied they would supply bricks, rocks and labor to construct the spillway and sinks for washing clothes. He asked how they would use overflow water; they said they would divert it to a community garden. He asked how they would pay for spare parts and repairs; they promised to take up a collection from all the villages drawing water from the new well.

“It’s not just about a bore hole,” Christensen said. “It’s about promotion of human rights, gender equality, community action, power of the people to make change.”

More information about WorldHope Corps is online at http://www.worldhopecorps.com/index.htm

---

[i] World Health Organization, Country System Fact Sheet 2006 - Malawi. Online at http://www.afro.who.int/home/countries/fact_sheets/malawi.pdf

[ii] WHO Country Cooperation Strategy, Malawi, 2005-2009 at page15. Online at

http://www.who.int/countryfocus/cooperation_strategy/ccs_mwi_en.pdf

[iii] Id. at page 12.

[iv] The others are pneumonia and all neonatal causes, including diarrhea. World Health Organization, Country System Fact Sheet 2006 - Malawi.

[v] WHO Country Cooperation Strategy, Malawi, 2005-2009 at page 12.

[vi] World Health Organization, “Safer Water, Better Health: Costs, benefits and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health,” at page 7. Available online at http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/safer_water/en/print.html

[vii] Id.

Surgical Checklist Said to Save Lives & Money

The use of a basic checklist was shown to be associated with a substantial decrease in surgical deaths and complications. In what the A.P. referred to as a “a large international study of how to avoid blatant operating room mistakes,” researchers found a 47 per cent decrease in death and a more than one third decrease in complications-from 11% to 7%– concomitant with the use of a 19 point checklist designed by the World Health Organization.

A.P reports that regarding the elements on the list (many of which concern matters such as verifying the patient’s identification, marking the area to be incised with a magic marker, discussing patient allergies and surgical team member responsibilities, and accounting for all needles, sponges and instruments after the surgery)

U.S. hospitals have been required since 2004 to take some of these precautions. But the 19-item checklist used in the study was far more detailed than what is required or what many institutions do.

The researchers estimated that implementing the longer checklist in all U.S. operating rooms would save at least $15 billion a year.
The study, which was conducted in both “wealthy” and “poor” nations in eight city hospitals across the world (including Seattle, Washington), was published in the New England Journal of Medicine; its results were said to have “startled the researchers.”