Atul Gawande: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform

Immanuel Kant

“Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end and never merely as a means to an end. ”

-Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals[1]

Atul Gawande has done it again. He has written a piece for the New Yorker that you simply have to read:  The Cost Conundrum.What a Texas town can teach us about health care.

Gawande writes that McAllen “is one of the most expensive health-care markets in the country. Only Miami-which has much higher labor and living costs-spends more per person on health care. In 2006, Medicare spent fifteen thousand dollars per enrollee here, almost twice the national average. The income per capita is twelve thousand dollars. In other words, Medicare spends three thousand dollars more per person here than the average person earns.”

El Paso, Texas, similarly situated, spends significantly less- half as much. The why of it is absolutely compelling. And it struck me while reading that what Gawande finds is essentially a medical culture functioning, and incentivized, contrary to Kant’s categorical imperative (see above): the simple moral admonition that one must not merely “use” others.

Might I suggest that it is passing strange to find ourselves, in the midst of such daunting medical, technical, and financial data contained within the  proposed solutions and counter-solutions to arrive at this–a simple (but difficult) age old moral truth?

Pragmatically, as one looks upon the current system of health care and health care finance,  it is well worth quoting Harold Luft from today’s Washington Times: “A redesigned system must create new incentives for those entities so their self-interested behavior leads to a better societal outcome.” Gawande offers examples of systems which provide an infrastructure conducive to Mr. Kant’s imperative.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=1

Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments

7 Responses to “Atul Gawande: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform”
  1. Rick Evans says:

    Atul Gawande practices at Brigham and Women’s hospital which is one of the most expensive hospitals in the most expensive health care state in the nation, Massachusetts. And, Brigham and Women’s hospital is part of Partner’s Healthcare which the Boston Globe Spotlight team reported colluded with Blue Cross/Blue Shield to jack up health insurance premiums and health care costs in the already costly commonwealth. Gawande writes well but talks a great game.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. Atul Gawande: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform : HEALTH REFORM WATCH…

    The categorical imperative for health reform. Atul Gawande in the New Yorker. Must Read….

  2. [...] Gawande’s article “The Cost Conundrum” offers a distinctively moral perspective on health reform. It has also become a cause celebre in policy circles. The Obama White House is [...]

  3. [...] June 14: Gawande fans at Seton Hall University School of Law write about it on their weblog: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform [...]

  4. [...] June 14: Gawande fans at Seton Hall University School of Law write about it on their weblog: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform [...]

  5. [...] a recent post considering Atul Gawande’s article on McAllen, Texas, which lamented Medicine performed as a [...]

  6. [...] of primary care physicians would in no way be a panacea– a point that is  highlighted by Atul Gawande’s New Yorker article. As the article made clear, health care delivery can be hamstrung after access is provided. I [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!