How the FDA is “Fundamentally Broken”

Photo bu itchmo via Flickr

Photo by itchmo via Flickr

AP has run a story on FDA investigatory practices that lends additional credence to the assertions of a number of FDA scientists who have publicly claimed that the FDA is “fundamentally broken.

The article focuses on a recent report by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) which exposes a dramatic decrease in medical device lab inspections over the course of the last few years.

AP writes:

“Medical devices are overseen by an FDA division called the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The center has been shaken by recent complaints from its own scientists that managers squelched debate, leading to the approval of devices that were of questionable effectiveness and perhaps not entirely safe.”

The Center has also been accused of allowing political influence to be a determinate factor in the approval process of medical devices.

The decline in laboratory inspections outlined by the POGO report is both precipitous and alarming. AP writes that the report shows that

“…the Food and Drug Administration has dramatically reduced inspections of “good laboratory practices” at facilities that do the earliest testing of medical devices. Such inspections declined from 33 in 2005, to seven in 2007, to just one last year, according to a report the group was releasing Wednesday. No inspections are planned for this year, the report said.”

Read the full POGO report here.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Comments

3 Responses to “How the FDA is “Fundamentally Broken””

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. How the FDA is “Fundamentally Broken” : HEALTH REFORM WATCH…

    Article describes one more way in which the FDA is “fundamentally broken.” Apparently, the FDA has ceased to inspect medical device laboratories. This article is one of three interesting articles this blog has written on the FDA–the other two of whi…

  2. [...] As the Center stated, “this would protect the interests of patients and advance sound choices about the risks, benefits, and economic value of off-label uses.” [...]

  3. [...] a long list of increasingly vocal complainants, including the Program on Government Oversight (citing “dramatically reduced inspections of ‘good laboratory practices’ at facilities [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!